|
|
Paleobiological
Studies Honoring Norman D. Newell.
Edited
by Paul A. Johnston and James W. Haggart.
1998.
xiv +461pp. University of Calgary press. ISBN 1-55238-005-x $59.95 (hardcovers)
and ISBN 1-55238-004-1 $44.95 (softcovers). Outside Canada, prices are
in$US. Shipping overseas $9.00.
Order
from: University of Calgary Press, c/oUBC Press, 6344 Memorial Road,
Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z2, Canada. Phone: (604) 822-5959. Fax: (604) 822-6083.
Email: ord...@ubcpress.ubc.ca
In
autumn 1995 a number of bivalve workers gathered at the Fifth Canadian
Paleontology Conference in Drumheller for a special symposium on a variety
of topics concerning the evolution of the Bivalvia. This must have been
a great opportunity for bivalve workers to meet and listen to one anotherís
work. This book is the publication that stems from that meeting, although
perhaps bizarrely over one third of the 30 papers printed in it are
by authors who do not appear to have been present at the conference.
As conference volumes go the lag between the conference and the appearance
of the volume is not too bad.
The
opening paper, by Thomas Waller, is clearly the highlight of the volume.
Wallerís 1978 (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society,
Series B 284: 345-365) paper on the cladistic analysis of the pteriomorphs
has been oft quoted and has been a key contribution in the post-Treatise
understanding of bivalve classification. This new paper has ambitious
coverage seeking to examine the relationship of the bivalves to other
molluscan classes, the relationships of the major bivalves clades and
a more detailed analysis of the Pteriomorpha. This will clearly be of
great interest to most palaeontologists and neontologists with an interest
in bivalve phylogeny, although I suspect that few will be surprised
to see widely (but not universally) accepted relationships, such as
the division of the bivalves and the rostroconchs from the other molluscan
classes, supported. There is an interesting conflict here between the
results of the detailed pteriomorph study, where Waller suggests a close
relationship between the oysters and the scallops, and another paper
in this volume by Campbell et al. based on molecular methodologies,
which places the oysters with the pterioids. There are to my mind a
number of questions about the way in which Waller has presented his
work. It has all the appearance of a cladistic analysis but nowhere
is there any mention of how the analysis was undertaken, how the apomorphies
were determined nor a character matrix. It is a central tenet of science
that all its ëexperimentsí should be repeatable but this
is unfortunately not the case here.
The
remaining 29 papers cover a very broad range of bivalve topics. The
editors have taken perhaps the rather odd decision of ordering them
by author alphabetically. This robs the volume of some cohesion, for
example there are more than one paper on rudists, oysters, inoceramids
etc but because their authors did not bear similar surnames they are
distantly placed. It would certainly have been quite easy to break the
papers into a number of sections.
As
with any conference volume the quality of the papers presented varies
enormously. Some, for example the suggestion by Johnston and Collom
that inoceramids are pteriomorphs will certainly provoke citation and
discussion for a long while to come. Others may slip in to the literature
as padding. Obviously different papers will appeal to different people.
Apart from the several papers which deal with evolutionary relationships
between higher bivalve taxa (Waller; Campbell et al., and Frischer
et al.), I was taken with the paper by Carter and Seed that seems
to show (at least semi-quantitatively) that the volume of calcite employed
in the shells of Mytilus edulis may be inversely related to water
temperature, and also by Savazziís careful study of the enigmatic
pectinid Pedum. There is a salutory lesson in the problems of
hardpart convergence as Johnston and Zhang use new better preserved
material to shepherd the Devonian bivalve Sinodora away from
the Anomalodesmata and into the palaeoheterodont Trigonoida. Seilacher
takes a rather popularist approach to rudists, regarding them as aberrant
"dinosaurs" who got too used to the optimum conditions in which they
could flourish and do their own thing, such that when the going got
tough and the environment changed they foundered - harking back to Schindewolf's
typolysis.
The
volume has been dedicated to Norman Newell, a man with a long, distinguished
and continuing career in bivalve palaeontology. Having such a broad
interest in bivalves, Newell cannot but be pleased with this volume.
Indeed this book with its broad coverage should be of interest to most
bivalve workers, palaeontologist or neontologists. It is quirky, but
conference volumes are and patience will overcome the strange paper
order. The index is good and useful. The price is not bad too, but a
warning. If you are considering buying it apply direct to the Canadian
distributors. In trying to obtain it from the UK and European address
given on the publicity material I discovered that that firm had never
even heard of it!
Liz
Harper, University of Cambridge
|
|